1. Background IPPF is a global healthcare provider and a leading advocate of sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR) for all. Led by a courageous and determined group of women, IPPF was founded in 1952 at the Third International Planned Parenthood Conference. Today, we are a movement of Member Associations (MAs) and Collaborative Partners (CPs) (henceforth referred to collectively as ‘Affiliates’) with a presence in over 146 countries. Our work is wide-ranging, including comprehensive sexuality education, provision of contraception, safe abortion, and maternal care and responding to humanitarian crises. We pride ourselves on being local through our members and global through our network. At the heart of our mission is the provision of – and advocacy in support of – integrated healthcare to anyone who needs it regardless of race, gender, sex, income, or how remote their location is. IPPF’s Strategy 2028, Come Together commits the Federation to feminist, rights-based action across four strategic pillars. Gender equality and inclusion run across the strategy rather than sitting within a single pillar. This is reflected in the Move the Sexuality Agenda pillar, which commits to shifting harmful social and gender norms and growing societal support for gender equality, and in the Nurture our Federation, which calls on to “walk the talk” by embodying feminist and inclusive values in its own structures, culture and ways of working. The strategy places people at the centre of care with a commitment to extending person-centred care to more people in more places. This commitment to gender equality and inclusion is tracked through Strategy 2028 Results Framework Indicator 6: Shifts in perception and attitudes in relation to gender equality and inclusion across the Federation and the communities we serve. Indicator 6 is deliberately broad in scope, spanning internal Federation culture and practice (Secretariat, and Affiliates) as well as external, community-facing shifts in norms, attitudes, and service delivery. To date, IPPF holds a range of evidence relevant to this indicator, generated through distinct MA surveys, programme evaluations, service-delivery data, and internal policy processes, but this evidence has not yet been brought together into a single account of what is known and where the gaps sit. In 2024, IPPF commissioned the first Indicator 6 study. It used a qualitative, participatory approach with four Member Associations across Africa, Latin America, the Arab World and South Asia regions and Secretariat stakeholders, reaching 55 participants through group sessions, key informant interviews and validation workshops. Because the Strategy was at an early stage of implementation, the study focused on learning rather than impact and was designed to lay the groundwork for later rounds. This consultancy is the second round of Indicator 6 research. It will build on the 2024 findings and recommendations and, where possible, establish measures that later rounds can track through to 2028. It will also better engage Affiliates and external stakeholders throughout. The Gender Steering Group, with support from the Performance, Learning & Impact (PLI) team, is commissioning a consultancy to consolidate this evidence base, design a coherent Indicator 6 measurement approach, and implement that approach to deliver the second round of Indicator 6 evidence. Members of the Gender Steering Group have surfaced a set of research and learning questions that directly inform the review’s scope, the methodology, and the resulting research (see Section 4).2. Objective of the Consultancy The primary objective of this consultancy is to conduct a macro review of existing evidence across the Federation relevant to Indicator 6, and to implement a review to measure shifts in perceptions and attitudes on gender equality and inclusion. The consultant(s) will work across three phases: Phase 1: Macro review and evidence mapping (existing Affiliate data, programme evaluations, service-delivery data, internal policy and culture evidence) Phase 2: Coordination with the Gender Steering Group, methodology refinement, and finalisation of data collection tools Phase 3: Implementation of the review based on the finalised methodology and delivery of the Indicator 6 second-round findings Applicants should propose their methodology for answering the proposed research questions (Section 4) as part of their technical proposal (see Section 10); this proposed methodology is a key selection criterion. Once selected, the consultant(s) will refine this methodology in light of the macro review findings and Gender Steering Group input before proceeding to implementation. The scope of work below therefore covers the macro review, methodology refinement, and full implementation through to final reporting. 3. Scope of Work The consultant(s) will carry out the following activities: Phase 1: Macro Review and Evidence Mapping Review the 2024 Indicator 6 final report, including its research questions, findings, limitations, and recommendations, and set out where this round repeats, extends, or departs from it. Review existing IPPF evidence relevant to Indicator 6, including Gender Self Assessment results, programme and MEL evaluations, service-delivery data on SGBV response, CSE, and SRH, internal culture and policy documentation (e.g. gender and gender-related/safeguarding policies), and any prior gender attitude or KAP-type surveys. Map this evidence against the two dimensions of Indicator 6: (a) internal Federation practice and culture, and (b) external, community-facing shifts in norms and service delivery- wider, social level changes that happen outside of the Federation affect how the communities we serve behave and access/experience services. Identify what is already measurable from existing data sources versus what would require new data collection. Assess progress on the recommendations made in the 2024 study. Identify comparable indicator frameworks and standardised measures used elsewhere in the sector for tracking gender-attitude and norm change, and assess their applicability to IPPF’s federated structure. Consult with IPPF PLI team members and relevant regional office Affiliate focal points to gather inputs and identify relevant documentation and data holders. Produce a consolidated evidence map and gap analysis. Phase 2: Gender Steering Group Coordination and Methodology Refinement Coordinate closely with the Gender Steering Group throughout the consultancy; the Group’s initial research questions (Section 4) should shape both the evidence review and the methodology proposed in the consultant’s technical proposal. Present macro review findings to the Gender Steering Group for validation and to surface additional evidence sources or perspectives. Refine the methodology proposed at application stage in light of the macro review findings and Gender Steering Group feedback, including recommended data collection approaches, standardised measures or indices for gender-equitable attitudes (and use of existing organisational assessment data, e.g., the Gender Assessment Toolkit), disaggregation (e.g. by Affiliate, region, Secretariat), sampling across Affiliates, and sequencing with existing MEL and Centres of Excellence (CoE) work. Finalise data collection instruments and tools required for implementation (e.g. survey instruments, interview/focus group guides, coding frameworks), and secure PLI and Gender Steering Group sign-off before proceeding to Phase 3. Phase 3: Implementation and Reporting Carry out the finalised methodology, including leading or coordinating data collection across the agreed sample of Affiliates and Secretariat stakeholders (e.g. survey administration, key informant interviews, focus group discussions, or extraction and analysis of existing/routine data, as applicable). For budget purposes, we anticipate sampling at least four Affiliates across varying geographies/contexts. It is anticipated that these engagements will be remote/desk-based; budget should not be allocated to travel at this time but may be considered at a later date if necessary. Revisiting some or all of the 2024 Affiliates would allow comparison overtime, while including new Affiliates would widen coverage. Proposed approaches should be justified, but will be sense-checked with regional IPPF staff. Clean, code, and analyse the resulting data, applying the standardised measures agreed in Phase 2. Answer the Research Questions, drawing on the Gender Steering Group’s proposed research questions (Section 4) and/or questions that have been refined or developed as a result of the Phase 1 and Phase 2 outputs, comparing findings with the 2024 study where the data allows, and clearly note any questions that remain only partially answerable and why. Produce the second-round Indicator 6 evidence base, disaggregated as agreed, alongside a documented dataset and codebook that IPPF can reuse for future rounds. Present final findings to the Gender Steering Group and PLI team, and incorporate feedback into the final report. Produce a final report presenting the macro review findings, evidence gap analysis, methodology, results, and recommendations for future measurement rounds. 4. Key Research and Learning Questions The following questions were identified by the Gender Steering Group and should directly inform the methodology proposed in the consultant’s technical proposal (Section 10), the scope of the macro review, and the data collection and analysis carried out in Phase 3. Applicants should address how their proposed methodology would answer these questions, and note where a question may only be partially answerable and why. Questions may be further refined upon award. This round should also address the overarching Results Framework question for Indicator 6, which the 2024 study did not directly answer: How have knowledge, attitudes, and practices around gender, including gender identities, roles, and norms, changed over the course of the Strategy? How has IPPF’s Strategy contributed to these changes? Defining and Conceptualising shifts What does it mean for IPPF to experience shifts in perception and attitudes related to gender equality and inclusion? What does “inclusion” mean in this context? What types of interventions achieve demonstrated shifts in perceptions and attitudes on gender equality and inclusion? How do these interventions achieve these shifts? Measurement How can we measure shifts in perception and attitudes related to gender equality and inclusion for the Secretariat and Affiliates? Can changes in service delivery on SGBV, CSE, and SRH be counted as shifts? If so, what existing data can be used to demonstrate this? Internal Culture and Practice How are we, as a Federation (Secretariat and Affiliates), embodying values related to gender equality and inclusion in practice? To what extent do the policies that IPPF has in place related to gender equality and inclusion translate into practice? To what extent have the recommendations from the 2024 Indicator 6 study been taken up, and with what effect? Federation and Community Perspectives To what extent do stakeholders believe gender equality and inclusion are valued across IPPF? Do Affiliates provide equitable and inclusive services to the communities they serve? 5. Deliverables and Timeline Deliverables must be completed by the end of June 2027. A complete list of deliverables and suggested timeline can be found in the table in the detailed Terms of Reference which you can download below. 6. Required Qualifications and Experience Technical Expertise Strong experience conducting evidence reviews, evidence synthesis, or landscape/mapping studies, on gender, social norms, and SRHR-related topics. Demonstrated understanding of gender equality and inclusion measurement, including familiarity with standardised gender-attitude, KAP, or social-norms measurement approaches. Experience designing measurement or evaluation methodologies for federated, multi-country, or multi-stakeholder organisations. Demonstrated ability to both design and implement a research methodology end to end, including leading or coordinating multi-country data collection (surveys, interviews, and/or focus groups) and conducting the resulting quantitative and/or qualitative analysis. Consultancy and Analytical Skills Proven ability to synthesise diverse and fragmented evidence into a clear, actionable evidence map. Strong skills in research design, including translating open-ended learning questions into an answerable and feasible methodology. Ability to propose practical, resource-appropriate measurement options and clearly communicate trade-offs between them. Ability to work independently, meet deadlines, and produce high-quality outputs with limited supervision. Sector and Organisational Experience Experience working with federated organisations, INGOs, or multi-country programmes (experience with IPPF or SRHR organisations is an asset). Familiarity with gender-transformative, feminist, and rights-based approaches to organisational culture and service delivery. Understanding of the practical and ethical considerations in measuring attitude and norm change across diverse contexts. Communication and Facilitation Skills Excellent written and verbal communication skills in English; additional languages (particularly French, Spanish, or Arabic) are an advantage. Strong facilitation skills, including experience presenting findings to and gathering input from technical steering groups or committees. Availability to engage with geographically dispersed teams across different time zones. The consultant will have a demonstrated commitment to SRHR, gender equality, and inclusive, rights-based approaches to research and measurement. 7. Reporting & Coordination Performance, Learning & Impact team – Overall project management and vendor coordination; primary point of contact for the consultancy. Gender Steering Group – Overall technical leadership; provide the research and learning questions guiding the review; review and validate interim findings and the proposed methodology. Consultant(s) – Delivery of all outputs, including the evidence review, gap analysis, methodology design, data collection and analysis, and final report. 8. Budget & Payment Structure The budget for this consultancy is $20,000. Payment will be made in tranches linked to milestone deliverables, as agreed in the final workplan.9. Confidentiality & Data Protection The consultant must comply with IPPF’s Data Protection Policy. No raw data, internal documentation, or consultation outputs will be stored or shared externally without prior written consent from IPPF. All materials developed under this consultancy remain the intellectual property of IPPF. 10. Proposal Submission Requirements Interested consultants should submit the items below to Morgan Brown: mbrown@ippf.org with the subject line "Proposal for Gender Indicator Study" by Sunday, 22 November 2026 at 11:59 PM GMT. Shortlisted candidates will be contacted by 1 December. The desired start date for this consultancy is 7 December. Proposals will be assessed based on technical expertise and relevant past work experience, feasibility of the proposed methodology, value for money, and demonstrated ability to complete the work within the specified timeframe. Technical Proposal (5 pages maximum) Contact information: Include your name, address, and contact information. Relevant experience: Describe relevant projects and contextual knowledge. Methodology: Outline the proposed approach to the macro review and a proposed methodology for answering the Gender Steering Group’s research questions (Section 4), building on the existing Indicator 6 evidence base, including proposed data collection approach(es), standardised measures or indices, sampling considerations across Affiliates, and an indicative timeline. This proposed methodology will be a key criterion in consultant selection. Approach: Outline the proposed approach to managing this consultancy, roles and responsibilities of the team member(s), and a workplan. Include risks and mitigation strategies. Annexes CV(s) of the lead consultant and any team members, no longer than three pages each. Two samples of relevant previous work (e.g. evidence reviews, gender/social norms measurement studies, or evaluation reports). Contact details of two professional references. Financial Proposal The budget for this consultancy is USD $20,000. The financial proposal should include a detailed line-item budget as shown below. Payments will align with deliverables, as agreed at contract signing. Please see suggested financial proposal format in the full Terms of Reference downloadable below.